Cyclic fatigue resistance of the WaveOne Gold Glider, ProGlider, and the One G glide path instruments in double-curvature canals

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of the WaveOne Gold Glider, ProGlider and One G glide path instruments in artificial double-curvature canals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 15 WaveOne Gold Glider (size 15/0.08), 15 ProGlider (size 16/0.08), and 15 One G (size 16/0.06) nickel titanium files. The files were used in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions until they were broken in artificial double-curvature canals made of stainless steel. The time to fracture was recorded via a digital stopwatch and the number of rotations until fracture was also calculated. The data were statistically analyzed via the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: The highest average number of rotations until fracture of the files was found for the WaveOne Gold Glider, followed by ProGlider and One G in order. Statistically significant differences were present between all groups of files (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the resistance of the WaveOne Gold Glider nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) file to cyclic fatigue in S-shaped curved canals was found to be higher than that of the ProGlider and One G Ni-Ti files.

Estudio comparativo de la conformación generada con las limas ProGlider y WaveOne Gold Glider en conductos curvos simulados / A comparative study of the shaping ability generated with ProGlider and WaveOne Gold Glider in simulated curved canals

Objetivo: Comparar, en conductos curvos simulados de Endo Training Blocks, la conformación alcanzada por las limas ProGlider y WaveOne Gold Glider. Materiales y métodos: Se utilizaron 20 Endo Training Blocks con conductos curvos. Los conductos fueron teñidos con tinta china. Los bloques fueron divididos al azar en dos grupos, A y B, de 10 bloques cada uno. En el grupo A los conductos se permeabilizaron y conformaron con limas ProGlider, y en el grupo B, con limas WaveOne Gold Glider, accionadas con movimiento rotatorio y reciprocante, respectivamente. Para realizar la evaluación, los conductos se dividieron en tres tercios (cervical, medio y apical), para lo cual se colocó debajo de cada bloque una hoja milimetrada, y en esa posición fueron fotografiados. Se observaron las imágenes y se estableció la siguiente categorización: 0, no conformado; 1, conformación parcial; 2, conformado. La comparación entre los dos grupos dentro de cada tercio fue realizada por medio de la prueba de Chi cuadrado o de la prueba exacta de Fisher, según correspondiera. La comparación entre tercios dentro de cada grupo fue efectuada con la prueba de Friedman. En ambos casos se fijó el nivel de significancia en P<0,05. Resultados: En los tres tercios evaluados, el WaveOne Glod Glider mostró mejores resultados que el ProGlider, obervándose diferencias estadísticas significativas entre los grupos dentro de cada tercio. La comparación entre tercios dentro de cada grupo mostró, en el grupo A, ausencia de diferencias significativas entre los tercios cervical y medio, en tanto el tercio apical fue significativamente diferente a los otros dos; en el grupo B hubo diferencias estadísticas significativas entre el tercio cervical y el medio, mientras no las hubo entre el apical y los otros dos. Conclusiones: En los tres tercios evaluados, el WaveOne Gold Glider mostró mejores resultados que el ProGlider (AU)

Aim: To compare in simulated curved canals of Endo Training Blocks, the shaping ability of ProGlider and WaveOne Gold Glider files. Materials and methods: Twenty Endo Training Blocks with curved canals were used. The simulated canals were dyed with China ink. The blocks were randomly assigned to two groups, A and B, of 10 blocks each. Group A canals were shaped with ProGlider files and group B ones with WaveOne Gold Glider files, operated with rotary and reciprocating motion respectively. For the evaluation, the canals were divided into three thirds (cervical, middle and apical). A sheet of graft paper was placed under each block and they were photographed. The images were observed and the following score was established: 0, not shaped; 1, partially shaped; 2, shaped. The comparison between the two groups within each third was made by means of the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. The comparison between thirds within each group was made by means of Friedman's test. In both cases, the level of significance was set at P<0.05. Results: WaveOne Gold Glider showed better results than ProGlider in the three evaluated thirds. Statistical significant differences were detected between groups in each third. The comparison between thirds within each group showed, in group A, no significant differences between the cervical and middle thirds, while the apical third presented significant differences with the other two. In group B, significant differences were observed between the cervical and middle thirds, while there were none between the apical and the other two thirds. Conclusions: In the three thirds evaluated, WaveOne Gold Glider showed better results than ProGlider (AU)